James Comey faces a second indictment, this time for a social media post interpreted as a threat against Donald Trump. The indictment was filed in the Eastern District of North Carolina on April 28, 2026, and it centers on a photo Comey shared on Instagram that raised alarms among officials.
The post featured seashells arranged to spell ’86 47′. The number 86 is slang for disposing of something, while 47 refers to Trump being the 47th president. Authorities argue that this combination constitutes a credible threat to Trump’s life.
Comey deleted the post shortly after publication, claiming he did not realize its violent implications. He asserts his innocence and maintains faith in the independent federal judiciary.
This indictment aligns with broader concerns regarding political prosecutions under the Trump administration’s Justice Department. Critics argue that such actions are attempts to intimidate political opponents. Todd Blanche, the acting U.S. attorney general overseeing the case, emphasized the challenge of proving intent in such matters.
The case has drawn attention not just for its content but also because it follows Comey’s previous indictment in September on charges of lying to Congress — charges that were subsequently dismissed. The legal landscape surrounding Comey is fraught with complexity and controversy.
Moreover, the Secret Service intervened following the Instagram post, conducting an interview with Comey due to concerns over threats against Trump. This incident raises questions about free speech and the boundaries of expression under the First Amendment.
As developments unfold, legal experts and observers remain divided. Some believe this indictment is an overreach, while others see it as necessary action against perceived threats. The next steps in this legal battle are uncertain, particularly given the charged political atmosphere surrounding both figures.
