In recent days, Eby convened an emergency caucus meeting where ten MLAs expressed their concerns about the government’s plan to suspend DRIPA. This meeting highlighted a growing divide, with five to six MLAs indicating they may not support the suspension. Joan Phillip, the MLA for Vancouver-Strathcona, has been vocal in her opposition, stating, “I don’t support a suspension. It suspends us in uncertainty. We need to have leadership that’s decisive, definitive, and gives us a clearer direction of where we’re going.”

In light of this dissent, the government has decided not to introduce the controversial bill this week as initially planned. The potential for making the DRIPA-suspension legislation a confidence vote looms large, which could force Eby to call an election if it fails to pass.

The B.C. Conservatives have also entered the fray, calling for a full repeal of DRIPA, further complicating the political landscape for Eby. Meanwhile, Green MLA Rob Botterell has stated that his party would vote against the confidence motion regarding DRIPA, indicating a broader coalition of opposition forming against the NDP’s current strategy.

Grand Chief Stewart Phillip has criticized Eby’s leadership, asserting, “I think the problem is Premier Eby himself and I think the NDP has a colossal leadership problem.” This sentiment reflects a growing frustration not only among party members but also within Indigenous communities who feel their rights are at stake.

As the situation evolves, Eby has emphasized the importance of engaging with Indigenous leaders, stating, “It is absolutely important that we do our best to get this right, even now, we are engaging with chiefs to try to find a path forward in a way that they can support and I hope to be able to have some chiefs standing with us.” However, the path forward remains fraught with challenges.

With the NDP holding a precarious one-seat majority in the legislature, the stakes are high. The outcome of this caucus revolt could have lasting implications for Eby’s leadership and the future of Indigenous rights legislation in British Columbia. As dissent grows, the question remains: can Eby unify his party and navigate the complexities of DRIPA, or will this internal conflict lead to a significant political shift in the province?

The post Caucus Revolt: David Eby Faces Growing Dissent in British Columbia appeared first on News Canada.

On April 13, 2026, Doly Begum won the Scarborough Southwest federal byelection for the Liberal Party, receiving an impressive 69.9 percent of the total votes cast. This translates to 20,114 votes, a remarkable feat that underscores her popularity among constituents. In contrast, her closest rival, Conservative candidate Diana Filipova, garnered just over 18 percent of the vote, totaling 5,300 votes. Meanwhile, Fatima Shaban of the NDP and Pooja Malhotra from the Green Party received 6 percent and 2.5 percent of the votes, respectively.

The byelection results come at a time when the Liberal Party is seeking to solidify its majority government, which now stands at 174 seats following Begum’s victory. This outcome is particularly significant given that voter turnout was reported at only 33.54 percent, suggesting that those who did participate were highly motivated to support Begum.

Begum’s political journey is noteworthy; she previously served as an MPP for Scarborough Southwest under the NDP and held the position of deputy party leader before switching to the Liberal Party. Her transition reflects a broader trend of political realignment in Canada, where voters are increasingly open to changing their allegiances based on candidates’ platforms and community engagement.

In her victory speech, Begum expressed gratitude to her supporters, stating, “Tonight truly belongs to you.” She emphasized the importance of community, saying, “Tonight, we celebrate something so powerful … a community coming together, putting aside their differences to choose hope, compassion, and progress.” This message resonates with many constituents who have been vocal about their struggles and aspirations.

Fatima Shaban, the NDP candidate, acknowledged the shifting political dynamics, remarking, “People have a right to change their minds and do whatever is right by themselves as long as they can get up and look themselves in the mirror.” This sentiment captures the essence of the current political climate, where voters are increasingly prioritizing personal values and community needs over party loyalty.

As the Liberal Party moves forward with its agenda, the implications of Begum’s victory will likely be felt beyond Scarborough Southwest. The party’s ability to maintain its majority will depend on how effectively it addresses the concerns of its constituents and adapts to the evolving political landscape.

While the immediate future looks promising for the Liberals, uncertainties remain regarding how this shift will influence upcoming elections and the broader political discourse in Canada. Details remain unconfirmed about how the party plans to leverage this victory to address pressing issues facing the community and the nation.

The post Doly Begum’s Stunning Byelection Victory in Scarborough Southwest appeared first on News Canada.

Stephen Lewis was a significant figure in Canadian activism, known for his work in politics, diplomacy, and humanitarian efforts. His career spanned decades, during which he became a prominent advocate for social justice and human rights. Lewis served as an Ontario New Democrat MPP starting in 1963 and was the leader of the Ontario NDP from 1970 to 1978. His political journey culminated in his role as Canada’s ambassador to the United Nations from 1984, where he championed global human rights initiatives.

Tragically, Lewis died early Tuesday morning at the age of 88 after battling cancer for the last eight years of his life. His passing marks the end of an era for many who admired his eloquence and integrity. Lewis’s family expressed their grief, stating, “The world has lost a voice of unmatched eloquence and integrity.” This sentiment resonates deeply within the communities he served and advocated for throughout his life.

Lewis was not only a politician but also a longtime journalist and environmental activist. He founded the Stephen Lewis Foundation in 2006, which aimed to support grassroots organizations in Africa working to combat the HIV/AIDS epidemic. His commitment to humanitarian causes was evident in his passionate speeches and public appearances, where he often highlighted the struggles of marginalized communities.

His contributions to social justice were not limited to international issues; he was also a vocal supporter of workers’ rights in Canada. Notably, he supported the miners’ wildcat strike in Elliot Lake during the 1970s, emphasizing the importance of labor rights and the fight against industrial disease. His advocacy for workers and human rights earned him respect across the political spectrum.

Reactions to his death have poured in from various leaders and activists. Mark Carney, a prominent figure in Canadian finance, remarked, “Lewis moved millions with his appeals for a compassionate and just society.” This statement encapsulates the profound impact Lewis had on both individuals and the broader social landscape. His ability to connect with people through his oratory skills was unparalleled, as noted by environmentalist David Suzuki, who said, “He combined his oratorical abilities with great intellect, commitment to ideals and a sense of humour.”

As the news of his passing spreads, many are reflecting on the legacy he leaves behind. Olivia Chow, a fellow NDP member, and others have expressed their condolences, highlighting the void his absence creates in the fight for social justice. The Ontario NDP, which Lewis once led, is now under the leadership of his son, Avi Lewis, adding a poignant layer to this moment of loss.

Looking ahead, observers believe that Lewis’s legacy will continue to inspire future generations of activists and politicians. His commitment to human rights and social justice will serve as a guiding principle for those who follow in his footsteps. The Stephen Lewis Foundation is expected to carry on his mission, ensuring that his work in supporting vulnerable communities endures. As the world mourns the loss of Stephen Lewis, it also celebrates a life dedicated to the betterment of society.

The post Stephen lewis: The Legacy of : A Voice for Justice Silenced appeared first on News Canada.

Avi Lewis has been named the new leader of the federal NDP, a significant development that could reshape the party’s future. Winning on the first ballot with 56% of the votes, Lewis received 39,734 out of a possible 70,930 votes, marking a decisive victory in a leadership election that many viewed as critical for the party’s resurgence.

The NDP has faced considerable challenges in recent years, notably being reduced to just seven seats in April 2025. This decline was exacerbated when Nunavut MP Lori Idlout crossed the floor to join the Liberals, leaving the NDP with only six seats. Lewis’s leadership comes at a time when the party is eager to rebuild and regain its footing in Canadian politics.

During his campaign, Lewis raised an impressive $1.4 million in donations, indicating strong grassroots support. His victory was celebrated with enthusiasm, as he stated, “This is a tremendous result,” and expressed confidence in the party’s future, saying, “If it isn’t already obvious, we are building a new foundation for our party and we are ready to come roaring back on the Canadian political stage.”

In the leadership race, Heather McPherson came in second place with 20,899 votes, highlighting the competitive nature of the election. The NDP’s recent Northern Tour, which included leader Marit Stiles and several MPPs, aimed to address pressing issues, including infrastructure and road safety.

Guy Bourgouin, an NDP member, noted the impact of their efforts, stating, “After years of pressure and the NDP Northern Tour, this government is finally paying attention.” This sentiment reflects a growing urgency within the party to address the needs of Canadians, particularly in the North, where the government has committed $600 million to build and repair highways.

As Lewis steps into his new role, the NDP faces an uncertain political landscape. The party’s ability to recover from its recent setbacks will depend on how effectively it can connect with voters and present a compelling alternative to the current government led by Doug Ford.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the specific strategies Lewis plans to implement as he takes the reins. However, the stakes are high for the NDP, and the coming months will be crucial in determining whether this leadership change can reinvigorate the party and expand its influence in Canadian politics.

The post Ndp: Avi Lewis Takes the Helm of the : A New Era Begins appeared first on News Canada.

As the conflict in Iran escalated, Wab Kinew, the Premier of Manitoba, emerged as a vocal critic of the war, which he described as a “dumb war” in a letter addressed to Canada’s Prime Minister. This conflict, which began on February 28, 2026, has already resulted in thousands of deaths across the Middle East and has significant implications for global oil supply, with 20 percent of the world’s oil crossing the Strait of Hormuz.

On March 27, 2026, Kinew delivered a powerful speech at the NDP’s national convention in Winnipeg, where he reiterated his condemnation of the war. He emphasized the economic pain it has inflicted on working people in Canada and North America, stating that “not a single Canadian should ever be put in harm’s way to defend Donald Trump’s foolish Iranian war.” His remarks resonated with the audience, culminating in a standing ovation.

Kinew’s speech also included advice for the next NDP leader, urging them to “win” in the upcoming leadership race, which is set to conclude on March 29, 2026. The NDP, which saw its seats drop from 24 to 7 after the April 2025 federal election, is at a pivotal moment in its history, and Kinew’s call for unity and strength is particularly relevant.

His assertion that the war is a distraction from pressing domestic issues highlights the broader concerns within Canadian politics regarding foreign interventions and their impact on local economies. Kinew’s leadership style, marked by directness and clarity, aims to galvanize support for the NDP as it seeks to rebuild its influence in federal politics.

The significance of Kinew’s statements cannot be overstated. By positioning himself as a leader who prioritizes the welfare of Canadians over foreign conflicts, he is attempting to reshape the narrative around the NDP and its role in advocating for the average citizen. This approach not only seeks to unify the party but also to appeal to a broader electorate disillusioned by traditional political rhetoric.

As the NDP prepares for its leadership announcement, Kinew’s emphasis on a strong, united front will be crucial in determining the party’s future direction. His passionate advocacy against the war in Iran reflects a growing sentiment among many Canadians who are increasingly wary of military engagements abroad.

In the coming days, as the NDP leadership race unfolds, Kinew’s influence and the reception of his message will be closely watched. The outcome of this convention could redefine the party’s trajectory and its ability to connect with voters in a rapidly changing political landscape.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full implications of Kinew’s statements on the NDP’s strategy moving forward, but his clear stance against the war positions him as a significant figure in the ongoing discourse surrounding Canadian foreign policy.

The post Wab Kinew’s Bold Stance Against the War in Iran appeared first on News Canada.

The New Democratic Party (NDP) has faced a tumultuous period since the 2025 federal election, struggling to maintain its relevance in Canadian politics. With only six seats in the House of Commons, the party has lost its official status, leaving many to question its future. The leadership race, which includes five candidates, including Avi Lewis, Heather McPherson, Rob Ashton, Tony McQuail, and Tanille Johnston, is seen as a pivotal moment for the party.

Before the race began, expectations were low, with 40% of past NDP voters believing the party’s best days were behind it. Furthermore, a staggering 44% of these voters did not recognize any of the current candidates. The NDP’s absence from the national conversation has been palpable, as noted by Kathleen Monk, who stated, “Since the 2025 loss, New Democrats have been missing from the national conversation.” This backdrop set the stage for a leadership contest that many hoped would reinvigorate the party.

However, the dynamics have shifted since the race commenced. The NDP’s membership has surged from 60,000 to approximately 100,000, indicating a renewed interest among supporters. This increase in membership could be a crucial factor as the party seeks to regain its footing. Voting for the leadership race opened shortly after the final debate in February and will close on Saturday at 7 p.m. ET, with around 2,000 New Democrats expected to attend the convention in Winnipeg.

Avi Lewis has emerged as the frontrunner in this contest, with former NDP leader Tom Mulcair expressing confidence in his chances, stating, “I’m expecting Avi Lewis to win.” This endorsement may reflect a broader sentiment within the party that Lewis represents a fresh start amid ongoing challenges.

Yet, the road ahead is fraught with difficulties. As political analyst Shachi Kurl pointed out, “This is going to be some hard slogging for the party to not only reintroduce itself to the country.” The NDP must not only choose a leader but also find a way to reconnect with a disenchanted electorate.

Expert voices suggest that the outcome of this leadership race could significantly impact the NDP’s strategy moving forward. Kim Wright noted, “There are always a number of voters who want to see how the candidates perform at the end of the campaign,” highlighting the importance of the final moments in the race.

The NDP’s future hinges on this leadership race, and the decisions made in the coming days will be critical for the party’s revival. As the voting deadline approaches, the stakes have never been higher for the NDP and its candidates, particularly for Lewis, who stands at the forefront of this crucial moment.

The post Avi Lewis: The Frontrunner in a Struggling NDP Leadership Race appeared first on News Canada.

Before the recent developments surrounding Bill C-9, known as the Combatting Hate Act, Canada had a relatively stable framework regarding hate speech laws. The Criminal Code included an exemption for hate speech if expressed in good faith regarding religious subjects, allowing individuals to express their beliefs without the fear of criminal prosecution. This exemption was seen as a safeguard for religious freedom, enabling diverse religious communities to practice and express their faith openly.

However, the landscape shifted dramatically when Bill C-9 passed its final vote in the House of Commons with 186 votes in favor and 137 against. The bill proposes significant changes, including the introduction of new Criminal Code offences that would criminalize the intentional promotion of hatred against identifiable groups in public, particularly through the use of hate or terrorism-related symbols. This decisive moment has raised eyebrows and sparked intense debate across the political spectrum.

The immediate effects of the bill’s passage are multifaceted. On one hand, the Bloc Québécois supported the bill, indicating a shift in legislative priorities towards a more stringent approach to combating hate. Conversely, the Conservatives and NDP voted against it, expressing concerns that the removal of the religious exemption could infringe upon religious freedoms. This division highlights the contentious nature of the bill and its potential implications for various communities in Canada.

Experts and community leaders have weighed in on the ramifications of Bill C-9. Justice Minister Sean Fraser has asserted that the amendment “will not criminalize faith,” aiming to reassure religious groups that their rights will remain intact. However, over 350 Muslim organizations, along with various religious leaders, have expressed concerns about the removal of the religious exemption, arguing that it has served as an essential safeguard for sincere expressions of belief. Bishop Pierre Goudreault emphasized that this exemption has historically protected Canadians from criminal prosecution for their truth-seeking expressions grounded in long-standing religious traditions.

Moreover, the bill includes provisions that criminalize the obstruction of access to places of worship, punishable by up to 10 years in prison. This aspect of the legislation aims to address increasing incidents of hate crimes targeting religious institutions, reflecting a growing concern for the safety and accessibility of worship spaces. Kevin Lamoureux, a member of the Liberal Party, has stated that the bill would not take away the religious rights of Canadians or hamper their ability to quote from scripture, attempting to mitigate fears surrounding the legislation.

As the bill moves to the Senate for further study, it remains to be seen whether amendments will be proposed to address the concerns raised by various stakeholders. The National Council of Canadian Muslims has expressed optimism that the text could be amended to assuage their worries, indicating a willingness to engage in dialogue to find a balanced approach to combating hate while preserving religious freedoms.

The removal of the religious exemption has been a point of contention for many years, with arguments that it could be used to promote homophobia, racial abuse, and antisemitism. As the debate continues, the implications of Bill C-9 will likely reverberate through Canadian society, prompting discussions about the balance between protecting individuals from hate and preserving the rights of religious expression. Details remain unconfirmed about the potential changes the Senate may suggest, but the outcome will undoubtedly shape the future of hate speech legislation in Canada.

The post Bill c9 canada: The Controversial Passage of Bill C-9 Canada: A New Era in Hate Speech Legislation appeared first on News Canada.

What does the passage of Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act, mean for religious freedoms in Canada? The bill has advanced to the Senate after a contentious vote in the House of Commons, where it passed with 186 votes in favor and 137 against. This legislation aims to criminalize intimidation and obstruction outside establishments used by faith-based groups and bans the intentional display of certain terrorism or hate symbols in public.

One of the most controversial aspects of the bill is the amendment that repeals the good faith religious speech defense from Canada’s hate speech laws. Justice Minister Sean Fraser has asserted that the new legislation will not criminalize faith, yet many critics, including over 350 Muslim organizations and leaders from various religious communities, have expressed significant concerns about the implications of this change.

The opposition to the bill has been vocal, with the Conservatives, NDP, and Green Party MP Elizabeth May dissenting against its provisions. The Conservatives argue that the removal of the religious exemption constitutes an assault on religious freedoms, a sentiment echoed by Bishop Pierre Goudreault, who stated, “The elimination of the religious-text defence raises significant concerns as it has served for many years as an essential safeguard.”

Moreover, David Cooke, a pro-life advocate, warned that the passage of Bill C-9 could lead to increased hostility towards Christians and similar groups. The Bloc Québécois made the amendment to remove the religious exemption a non-negotiable condition for their support, highlighting the political complexities surrounding this legislation.

The Senate is expected to begin studying Bill C-9 on April 14, following the Easter recess. This review may lead to further amendments or discussions regarding the bill’s provisions. Notably, the proposition to halt the third reading and send the bill back to the Standing Committee was defeated with a vote of 188 to 125, indicating strong support for the bill among the governing party.

As the legislative process continues, the potential ramifications of Bill C-9 remain a focal point of debate. The bill includes a clause stating that nothing in certain subsections shall be construed as prohibiting a person from communicating a statement on a matter of public interest, which may provide some reassurance to its critics.

In summary, Bill C-9 represents a significant shift in Canada’s approach to hate speech and religious expression. The outcome of the Senate’s review could have lasting implications for how hate speech laws are applied in the country, particularly concerning religious freedoms. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential amendments that may arise during the Senate discussions.

The post Bill c9: Bill C-9: A Controversial Step in Combatting Hate appeared first on News Canada.